The fair value of IndusInd Bank (INDUSINDBK), built from its filed accounts — ten years of results, the method that fits this business, and what today's price already assumes.
We do not publish one number for IndusInd Bank — and here is why.
IndusInd Bank is really several different businesses under one roof, and they do not work the same way. Adding them together into a single “fair value” would produce a figure that describes none of them. So we value each part on its own terms instead of printing one number that looks tidy and means little.
Worked backwards from today's share price: the return on equity today’s price implies for IndusInd Bank, against what the model assumes.
How to read this. The number on the left is the return on equity today’s share price quietly takes for granted. The number on the right is what the model actually assumes. When the two are far apart, that gap is the bet you would be taking.
Revenue and earnings per share in ₹, return on equity and leverage as ratios — all from the filed statements.
Revenue and net profit as filed, in ₹ crore.
| Year | Revenue | Net profit | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 35,736 | 4,458 | 12.5% |
| FY2022 | 38,230 | 4,805 | 12.6% |
| FY2024 | 55,144 | 8,977 | 16.3% |
| FY2025 | 56,358 | 2,575 | 4.6% |
| FY2026 | 53,480 | 889 | 1.7% |
A bank is not valued with a discounted cash flow. Deposits are its raw material and interest is operating income, so enterprise value means nothing here. It is valued on excess return instead — the profit it earns above the cost of the equity funding it.
Excess return — the correct lens for a bankUnderstand this method
The same valuation, run side by side.
IndusInd Bank vs Axis BankThe closest private-bank comparison on size and mix.→IndusInd Bank vs Kotak Mahindra BankSmaller book, a different margin and risk profile.→IndusInd Bank vs HDFC BankThe largest private bank, on the same excess-return model.→At ₹956 the market is pricing in roughly 13.0% sustained ROE, against the ~1.2% its own record supports. That is more than it has delivered, so the price is justified only if the business can hold a rate it has not previously sustained.
This business is a group of operations with different economics, so a single blended figure would describe none of them. The parts are valued separately and the breakdown is in the report, rather than one number that cannot be defended.
Revenue went from ₹0.36 lakh crore to ₹0.53 lakh crore over the period shown, while return on equity moved from 12.0% to 1.4%. Growing scale on a rising return is a very different proposition from growing scale on a falling one.
Debt to equity stands at 0.66, down from 0.76 at the start of the period — the balance sheet is a core input to the cost of capital used here.
From published financial statements. The method is chosen to fit the business — a bank on excess return, a regulated utility on its rate base, a conglomerate by its parts — and every assumption is shown with its source. When the numbers do not support an estimate, no estimate is published. This is an educational research tool: it reports what the model computed and does not recommend buying or selling anything.
A cost of capital of 11.37%, growth drawn from the company's own record rather than from guidance, and the valuation method that fits the business. All of them are listed in the report, with how much each one moves the answer.